|
core concepts | changed teachings | questionable doctrine | scandal | interesting | quotes | blog |
|
Changed Teachings
Medical Advice
|
Changing Watchtower Prophetic Interpretation:
|
| Scripture | Prophecy | Original interpretation | Current Interpretation |
| Daniel 12:7 Revelation 11:3-6 | 1260 days | 538 A.D. - 1799 A.D. The period of Papal rule | 1914 - 1918 Rutherford's imprisonment |
| Daniel 12:11 | 1290 days | 538 A.D. - 1829 A.D. Start of Papal rule to start of Miller movement | 1918 - 1922 Formation of League of Nations to the Cedar Point Convention |
| Daniel 12:12 | 1335 days | 539 A.D. - 1874 A.D, Start of Papal rule to the Lord's second presence | 1922 - 1926 Cedar Point Convention to the English Convention |
| Daniel 8:14 | 2300 days | 454 B.C. - 1846 A.D. Rebuilding of the temple to modern cleansing of the sanctuary | 1938 - 1944 Reinvigoration of theocratic order after World War II |
| Daniel 4 | 2520 days - 7 times | End of the Last Days | Beginning of the Last Days |
| Elijah | Elisha | Reference | |
| Russell | 144,000 | Heavenly Great Crowd | W1889 August p.1 |
| Rutherford | Pre 1919 work | Post 1919 work | w1937 p.126 |
| Knorr | Work pre Rutherford | Work post Rutherford | w1965 August 15 pp.492-9 |
As will be shown, from Rutherford onwards interpretation became less logically consistent. Lack of consistent methodology
has allowed desired explanations to be squeezed from almost any Scripture.
Franz' imagination knew no bounds; as seen from the 42 types and prophecies in You May Survive Armageddon into God's New World
(1955) pages 367-368 that were supposed to point to the Great Crowd. This included Rahab the Harlot,
Lot and his daughters and "the very great multitude of fish that come to life in the healed waters of the Red Sea."
Current interpretation lacks consistency in many areas due to combining a matrix of methods to explain each passage, and
arbitrarily choosing what to explain as literal or figurative. For instance, at times the word 'days' will be said to be literal days, at
other times years and at yet other times be considered figurative. In the 1800's, the 1260 days of Revelation 11:3 were
interpreted as years extending to 1799 A.D.(Three Worlds 1877 p.114), now they are literal days during World War One.
And whilst the 1260 days of Revelation 11:3 are interpreted as a literal period of time, six verses later
the 3 ˝ days at are said to be figurative. (Revelation, Its Grand Climax At Hand! pp.164-168)
Likewise, in the description of the 144,000 of Revelation 7:4 and 14:1, the number 144,000 is taken as literal but
the statement that they are virgins, Jewish, male and standing on Mount Zion are all explained as figurative.
(Revelation, Its Grand Climax At Hand! pp.116, 117, 198, 199) This method of interpretation makes it
possible to arrive at whatever preconceived meaning is desired. That is why it is possible to have a new interpretation created
every few decades.
A book could be devoted to the changing Watchtower interpretation of Revelation. Rather than show each change, it is noted that
within one century there were five major Watchtower publications attempting to interpret Revelation, each one substantially different
than the one before. In 1917 The Finished Mystery was released. Then came Light (1930), followed by
Babylon the Great Has Fallen! God's Kingdom Rules (1963), Then Is Finished the Mystery of God (1969) and most recently
Revelation, Its Grand Climax At Hand! (1988). The September 2006 Kingdom Ministry insert listed 70 changes that need to
be made to the Revelation Climax book.
The Watchtower claims that Jesus commenced his inspection of religious groups in 1918, and chose the Watchtower Society as the
sole organization worthy of representing him, based on the spiritual food being served. Some of the food at that time is contained in
the 1917 book The Finished Mystery. This was held up as the fulfilment of prophecy, "God-given interpretation" (Watch Tower
1917 December 15) and "the first and only book that makes clear every part of Revelation and Ezekiel." (Watch Tower 1917 October 1) It continues to proudly be described in the Proclaimers and Revelation Climax books as a
powerful classic.
In reality, almost every page of The Finished Mystery contains information that a Witness today would mock if they did not know it was one of their own. The majority of its teachings were incorrect and discarded in following publications. Some of the claims in The Finished Mystery were;
New books explaining Revelation have been necessary to replace preceding wrong interpretations. Even the latest Revelation book still contains ideas that are clearly wrong and will need to be changed again over time. The number of contradictory interpretations that the Watchtower Society have presented shows that these are little more than stabs in the dark, not a collection of teachings directed by God's Holy Spirit. How does the Organization explain such a major rewrite of the prophetic explanations? Revelation, It's Grand Climax At Hand! P.8 states;
The claim is made that these changes signify 'a flash of new light'. But wasn't The Finished Mystery said to be 'God given'?
Can it truthfully be said that God gave the original interpretation if it was blatantly incorrect?
When there have already been 5 vastly different attempts to get it right how can people believe a rewrite is new light from
Jehovah and not just more of the same wrong light?
Take as examples the explanation of what the star named Wormwood is meant to signify, or who Michael the Archangel signifies.
This was not "new light" resulting as "world events continued to unfold".
There have been three different versions of 'God given light' in the Watchtower publications so far;
Michael the Archangel is described in Daniel 10:13 as "Mi´cha·el, one of the foremost princes" and at Revelation 12:7 it says " Mi´cha·el and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled." In the fifty years between 1880 and 1930 there were five changes as to who Michael was.
The Governing Body of the Watchtower Society demonstrate that they have no idea as to how to interpret Revelation.
A number of the prophetic interpretations for Daniel show another classic struggle of attempting to find a modern day fulfilment that does not exist, resulting in contradiction, changes, inconsistencies and little hint of divine guidance. The current understanding is often quite amusing. The prophecies discussed here are;
During the 1800's Russell taught that the 1260, 1290 and 1335 days all started at the beginning of papal rule in 539 A.D. With 539, 1799 and 1874 no longer being considered relevant the explanation for these prophecies also have changed.
At Daniel 12:7 and Revelation 11:3-6 it discusses a period of 3 ˝ years, or 1260 days. During the 1800's the Watchtower claimed this was prophetic of 1260 years. Now it is said to be a period of days that roughly correspond to 1260 literal days.
The 1260 days were explained to be the period of power for the Papal Church. At first this was 538 - 1798 A.D. (Zion's Watch Tower December 1881 p.7). This was later adjusted to 539 - 1799 A.D.
In the 1900's, the 1260 days were changed to be literal days.
In 1930, Light I explained the 1260 days extend from November 7 1914 with the release of a specific Watch Tower article,
concluding May 7th 1918 when an arrest order on Rutherford and the Watchtower board members was issued.
In 1969, the start of the 1260 days was changed, now extending from end of Gentile Times October 4th 1914 to the memorial of March 26th 1918. (See Then is Finished the Mystery of God, p261-263)
In 1977, the start of the 1260 days was changed to Dec 28th 1914, ending June 21st 1918. This was the period from when the Bible Students expected to be persecuted until Rutherford's release from imprisonment.
In 1988, the Revelation book went back to the 1969 interpretation.
In 1993, the Watchtower returned to the 1977 interpretation.
In 2007 Jehovah's Witnesses once more reviewed the 1993 Revelation book at their Book Study. The September 2006 Kingdom Ministry insert made the following change regarding the 1260 days.
It is amusing to think a Witness will consider this "new light", when in actual fact it was old light from 1977, re-replacing incorrect new light.
What is interesting when examining the 1993 understanding is that from December 28th to June 21st is not 1260 days, but 1272 days. Additionally, why start December 1914? World War 1 started in August and the Gentile times apparently ended in October. The Watchtower simply decided the event of June 21st 1918 to have been an auspicious date, worthy of prophecy, and then counted back roughly 1260 solar days to a non-eventful month in 1914.
Note: The 1260 days of Revelation 11:3 are not to be confused with the 1260 days of Revelation 12:6.
This second period is described as;
Originally the 1290 days of Daniel 12:11 were the 1290 years that extended from 539 A.D, to 1829. This marked the start of the Miller movement and the message of the Second Advent of Christ. (Studies in the Scriptures, Series 3 p.84, Series 7 pp.40, 60, 163. Watchtower 1914 November 1)
The 1290 days now have been given a rather unusual 20th century application. This time period is now said to refer to days and not years, and be related to the period of time between the set up of the League of Nations in January 8th 1918 to the Cedar Point convention on September 3rd 1922.
Strangely enough there are not 1290 days, but 1334 days between these two conventions, so the prophecy is around two months out. To make it fit the Watchtower makes the claim that Daniel was referring to 30 day months and hence 43 months. From January 1918 to September 1922 is 43 months if you do not count the first and last month. In other words solar days are converted to lunar months and then applied to solar months to make this prophecy fit, quite a stretch of the imagination.
In more recent times the Watchtower presents the information in a manner that makes it almost appear to be a literal 1290 days.
The 1335 days was interpreted to mean 1335 years after papal rule had started in 539 A.D, coming to "the Lord's second presence" in 1874 A.D. (Creation 1927 2,175,000 ed. p.298)
The prophecy of 1335 days is now applied to the time period between the Cedar Point convention on September 3 1922 and the London convention held May 1926.
This appears to be the same reasoning as used with the 1290 days. In this case there are about 1360 days between these two conventions. Consistent use of the convert lunar-to-solar-months-in-between method as applied to the 1290 day prophecy would make this prophecy over shoot the convention by a couple of months.
In the early 1800's John Aquila Brown taught that the 2300 days of Daniel 8:14 ended in 1844. Russell felt the cleansing of the sanctuary at the end of the 2300 days occurred in 1846, understood to be when Storrs abandoned false doctrines. Studies in the Scriptures Series 3 pp.67,108 and Series 7 p.163 explains that 2300 years extends from 454 B.C. (the start of the prophecy of the 70 weeks with the rebuilding of the temple) to 1846 A.D.
The current understanding of the 2300 days show just how strange Watchtower interpretation has become in a vigorous effort to find some 20th century application. From June 1st 1938 to October 15th 1944 is about 2320 days.
Daniel 4 contains the prophecy of seven times. This prophecy has also changed from a 19th century centric understanding to a 20th century one. During the 1800's,
this prophecy was to signify the end of the system of things in 1914. During the 1900's, this prophecy was changed to signify
the beginning of the system of things in 1914.
Utilising yet another method of calculation, the Seven Times are explained as 'lunar' days converted to 'solar' years.
Taking a 'time' to be equal to a 360 day lunar year, seven times are 2520 days, which become 2520 lunar years.
However, from 607 B.C. to 1914 A.D. is 2520 solar years, so this prophecy is worked out as 1 lunar day equalling 1 solar year.
The Watchtower Society uses a plethora of principles to explain prophecy, allowing them to arrive at any range of different
understandings. By this method explanations were kept fresh and exciting for those living in the 1800's, replaced in the 1900's with
new explanations with seemingly current application. Now that we have entered the 21st century, the application to articles and
conventions from almost one hundred years ago seem distant and irrelevant, even humorous. Russell's 19th Century applications contained
far more logical reasoning than Rutherford's 20th Century application, and are still accepted by some Adventist religions.
Almost every time that the Watchtower now applies a portion of Revelation to itself or the modern era, closer examination shows
nothing in the text uniquely points to such a application. Consider examples such as;
Five books have been dedicated to the meaning of Revelation, each one overthrowing much of the understanding of the previous one. To say God gave these woefully contradictory and wrong interpretations is uncalled for. If the understanding of prophecy changes dramatically over time and is revised when something that sounds more relevant occurs, can it be said interpretations are "flashes of light" revealed by Jehovah? Would it not be more correct to say it is written by eager Bible students fumbling around with doctrine?